Excellent

Good

Regular

Bad

1.

Coherence between the title and the content

2.

Relevance and originality of the text

3.

Relevance between summary, keywords, and text content

4.

Clarity in the exposition

5.

Structural Coherence

6.

Conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

7.

Correlation between the content and

the conclusions

9.

Application of NOVA TELLVS criteria in citations, footnotes, and bibliography

10.

Relevance between the content and

the bibliography used

1. I consider your proposal to be publishable as it is, although it could be improved if you consider the following suggestions:  

2. The publication of your text is subject to the following changes: ……………………….

3. I have rejected your proposal on the grounds that it does not meet the criteria set out above, and I consider that ……………………………………………………………………..

Publishable

Publishable conditioned to the execution of the indicated changes

Not Publishable

I wish to revise the modified version of the article

Yes

No

Date of reception of the work to be reviewed

Year/Month/Day

Date of issuance of the ruling

Year/Month/Day