Indiferentismo ontológico y fenomenología en la Física de Aristóteles
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper discusses the theoretical model that Aristotle presents in his Physics, drawing special attention to its thematic and methodical basic features. Aristotle's account of natural objects and processes can be characterized as phenomenological, in contrast with causal-reductive views. This sort of account focuses on a dimension of manifestation and experience that is previous to any sharp distinction between what modern philosophers use to call the 'subject' and the 'object' of knowledge.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The authors who publish in NOVA TELLVS accept the following terms:
- The author or authors commit themselves to sign a Declaration of unpublished text and proprietary rights assignment authorizing the publication in the different platforms and spaces of diffusion of NOVA TELLVS and ceding the proprietary rights on the work in total and exclusive form to the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, according to article 84 of the Federal Law of Copyright and others relative and applicable to its regulation, in the understanding that the right of the author over the work will be respected, and the corresponding credit will be granted to them.
- All texts published by NOVA TELLVS—without exception—are distributed under the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution - Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 International), which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and specify that the first publication was made in this journal.
- Authors may enter into other independent and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in NOVA TELLVS (e.g. including it in an institutional repository or making it known in other paper or electronic media) provided that it clearly and explicitly states that the work was first published in this journal.
- For all of the above, together with their proposed material, authors must submit the Declaration of unpublished text and proprietary rights assignment format of the first publication duly requisitioned and signed by the authors. This format should be sent as a PDF file to novatellus@unam.mx or iiflnovatellus@gmail.com
References
ALLEN, R. E. (ed.), Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, London, 1965.
AUBENQUE, P., Le probléme de l'etre chez Aristote, París4, 1977 (1962).
BARNES, J.-SCHOFIELD, M.-SORABJI, R. (eds.), Anides on Aristotle, vol. 1: Science, London, 1975.
BECKER, O., Mathematische Existenz. Untersuchungen zur Logik und Ontologie mathematischer Phanomene, Tübingen, 1973= Halle, 1927.
BERTI, E., "Aristote et la méthode dialectique du Parrnenide de Platón", La méthodologie d'Aristote, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 133-134, 1980, pp. 341-358.
—, "II valore epistemológico degli endoxa secondo Aristotele", Seminarios de Filosofía 14, 2001 (en prensa).
BROADIE, S., "Aristotle's Perceptual Realism", The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXXI, Suppl, 1993, pp. 137-159.
BROACKES, J., "Aristotle, Objectivity, and Perception", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17, 1999, pp. 57-113.
BRÜCKER, W., Aristóteles, Frankfurt, a. M.4, 1974.
CARTERON, H., La notion de forcé dans le systéme d'Aristote, París, 1955.
DÜRING, I. (ed.), Naturphilosophie bei Aristóteles und Theophrast, Heidelberg, 1966.
EVERSON, S., Aristotle on Perception, Oxford, 1997.
FREDE, M., "The Original Notion of Cause", en Schofield-Burnyeat-Barnes, 1980, pp. 217-249.
FURLEY, D. J.-R. E. ALLEN, Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, vol. I: The Beginnings of Philosophy, London, 1970.
GILLESPIE, C. C. (ed.), Dictionaiy of Scientific Biography, vol. 1, New York, 1970.
GOLDSCHMIDT, V., Temps physique et temps tragique chez Ansióte, París, 1982.
GRAHAM, D., Aristotle 's Two Systems, Oxford, 1987.
HEIDEGÜER, M., "Vom Wesen und Begriff der (p>ai<;"; citado por la reproducción en Heidegger, 1967, pp. 309-371.
—, "Die Frage nach der Technik", en Heidegger, 1954, pp. 9-40.
—, Vortrage und Aufsatze, Pfüllingen, 1990 (1954).
—, Wegmarken, Frankfurt, a. M., 1967 y reimpr.
HICKS, R. D., Aristóteles, De anima, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, 1990=Cambridge, 1907.
HUSSEY, E., Aristotle's Physics, Books III-IV, Oxford, 1983.
IRWIN, T., Aristote's First Principies, Oxford, 1990 (1988).
JAEGER, W., Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristóteles, Berlin, 1912.
LE BLOND, J. M., Logique et méthode chezAristote, París, 1973 (1939).
MANSIÓN, A., Introduction a la physique aristotélicienne, Louvain2, 1946.
MANSIÓN, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problémes de méthode, Louvain, 1980 (1961).
MORROW, G. R., "Qualitative Change in Aristotle's Physics", en Düring, 1966, pp. 154-167.
ÓFFENBERGER, N.-SKARiCA, M. (eds.), Beitrüge zum Satz vom Widerspruch und zur Aristotelischen Pradikationstheorie, en N. Óffenberger (ed.), Zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik, vol. VIII, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, 2000.
OWEN, G. E. L., "TiGévaí tá (paivófieva", en S. Mansión, 1961, pp. 83-103; reproducido en Owen, 1986, pp. 239-251.
—, "Aristotle: Method, Physics, and Cosmology", en Gillespie, 1970, pp. 250-258; reproducido en Owen, 1986, pp. 151-164.
—, Logic, Science and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, ed.
M. Nussbaum, Ithaca (N. Y.), 1986.
POPPER, K., "Back to the Presocratics", Conjectures and Refutations, London, 1963, cap. 5; citado por la reproducción en Furley-Allen, 1970, pp. 130-153.
Ross, W. D., Aristotle's Physics, Oxford, 1936 y reimpr.
RUDOLPH, E. (ed.), Zeit, Bewegung, Handlung. Studien zur Zeitabhandlung des Aristóteles, Stuttgart, 1988.
SCHOFIELD, M.-BuRNYEAT, M.-BARNES, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism.
Studies in Hellenistic Epislemology, Oxford, 1980.
SORABJI, R., Time, Creation, and the Continuum. Theories in the Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Ithaca (N. Y.), 1983.
—, Matter, Space, and Moñón. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel, Ithaca (N. Y.), 1992 (1988).
Vico, A. G., "Orden espacial y orden temporal según Aristóteles (Ph., IV 11, 219a 10-21)", Méthexis III, 1990, pp. 65-83.
—, Aristóteles, Física, Libros III-IV; trad. esp., intr. y com., Buenos Aires, 1995.
—, "Sustancia, sucesión y permanencia según Aristóteles. El componente temporal en la distinción categorial sustancia-accidentes", Tópicos, 14, 1998, pp. 153-191.
—, "Homonymie, Erklarung und Reduktion in der aristotelischen Physik", en N. Óffenberger-M. Skarica, 2000, pp. 89-116.
VLASTOS, G., "The Disorderly Motion in the Timaios", Classical Quarterly 33, 1939, pp. 71-83; reproducido en Alien, 1965, pp. 379-399.
VOLPI, F., "Chronos und Psyche. Die aristotelische Aporie von Physik IV, 14, 223 a 16-29", en Rudolph, 1988, pp. 26-62.
WIELAND, W., "Das Problem der Prinzipienforschung und die aristotelische Physik", Kant-Studien 52, 1960-1961, pp. 206-219; citado por la reproducción en Barnes-Schofíeld-Sorabji, 1975, pp. 127-140.
—, Die aristotelische Physik, Gottingen2, 1970; reimpresión corregida de la primera edición de 1962 con un nuevo "Nachwort", 1970.